From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Harding

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Mar 25, 1986
506 A.2d 1152 (Me. 1986)

Opinion

Submitted March 4, 1986.

Decided March 25, 1986.

Janet T. Mills, Dist. Atty., Kevin J. Regan, Asst. Dist. Atty., Auburn, for the State.

Peters Randlett, Thomas P. Peters, II, Lewiston, for defendant.

Before NICHOLS, ROBERTS, VIOLETTE, WATHEN, GLASSMAN and SCOLNIK, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Robert Harding appeals his conviction in Superior Court, Androscoggin County, of aggravated assault, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 208 (1983), contending that the sanction imposed on the State for discovery violations was inadequate. Harding also objects to a jury instruction, which he had requested, concerning a witness not available for trial. We conclude that the sanction imposed on the State was within the court's discretion, and we find no obvious error in the jury instruction.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.


Summaries of

State v. Harding

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Mar 25, 1986
506 A.2d 1152 (Me. 1986)
Case details for

State v. Harding

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Maine v. Robert HARDING

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Date published: Mar 25, 1986

Citations

506 A.2d 1152 (Me. 1986)