From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hardin

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Jan 29, 2020
429 S.C. 403 (S.C. 2020)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2018-002035 Opinion No. 27938

01-29-2020

The STATE, Petitioner, v. Archie More HARDIN, Respondent.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Joshua Abraham Edwards, both of Columbia; and Solicitor David Michael Pascoe Jr., of Orangeburg, for Petitioner. Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek and Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, both of Columbia; and Daniel Carson Boles, of Boles Law Firm, LLC, of Charleston, for Respondent.


Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Joshua Abraham Edwards, both of Columbia; and Solicitor David Michael Pascoe Jr., of Orangeburg, for Petitioner.

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek and Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, both of Columbia; and Daniel Carson Boles, of Boles Law Firm, LLC, of Charleston, for Respondent.

ORDER

The petition for rehearing is granted, and we dispense with further briefing. The attached opinion is substituted for the previous opinion, which is withdrawn.

/s/ Donald W. Beatty , C.J.

/s/ John W. Kittredge , J.

/s/ Kaye G. Hearn , J.

/s/ John Cannon Few , J.

/s/ George C. James, Jr. , J.

PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in State v. Hardin , 425 S.C. 1, 819 S.E.2d 177 (Ct. App. 2018). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Hardin

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Jan 29, 2020
429 S.C. 403 (S.C. 2020)
Case details for

State v. Hardin

Case Details

Full title:The State, Petitioner, v. Archie More Hardin, Respondent.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Date published: Jan 29, 2020

Citations

429 S.C. 403 (S.C. 2020)
839 S.E.2d 878