State v. Hampton

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Kenneth Hampton, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 23, 2013

Appellate Case No. 2013-000680 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 23, 2013)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2013-000680 Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-493

12-23-2013

The State, Respondent, v. Kenneth Hampton, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan and John Benjamin Aplin, both of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Lexington County

Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan and John Benjamin Aplin, both of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.