From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hamm

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Apr 30, 1991
807 S.W.2d 692 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991)

Summary

indicating that Missouri follows the traditional rule where defendant voluntarily pays fine before appeal

Summary of this case from State v. Malone

Opinion

No. WD 43292.

April 30, 1991.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, LAFAYETTE COUNTY, JOHN G. MILLER, J.

Brent R. Hamm, Moberly pro se.

Randall W. Shackelford, Sp. Asst. Pros. Atty., Lexington, for respondent.

Before NUGENT, C.J., P.J., SHANGLER, GAITAN and FENNER, JJ.


This is an appeal from a misdemeanor conviction in a court-tried case. Appellant was charged with following another vehicle too closely, in violation of § 304.017 RSMo 1986. The judgment of the court was a fine of $35.00 and costs.

The appeal is dismissed.

On appeal, appellant contends that the trial court erred by not informing him of his right to a jury trial. However, we do not reach this issue because the appeal is moot. The legal file indicates that, following his conviction, appellant paid his fine and costs without first filing his appeal or an appeal bond, and without making any record that the payment was made under protest or that it was made with any reservations.

Therefore, pursuant to State v. Welch, 701 S.W.2d 770 (Mo.App. 1985), we dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction because of the voluntary payment of the fine and costs before appeal. Under these circumstances, the state is no longer an interested party and the issues are moot. Id. at 771. In order to preserve any issue for appeal in a criminal case where the sentence consists of a fine and costs, the defendant must make payment of the fine under circumstances that record the payment as not voluntarily made, if payment occurs before appeal. Id.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

State v. Hamm

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Apr 30, 1991
807 S.W.2d 692 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991)

indicating that Missouri follows the traditional rule where defendant voluntarily pays fine before appeal

Summary of this case from State v. Malone
Case details for

State v. Hamm

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. BRENT R. HAMM, APPELLANT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Apr 30, 1991

Citations

807 S.W.2d 692 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

State v. Zeigenbein

" Id.Welch was followed in State v. Hamm, 807 S.W.2d 692 (Mo.App.W.D. 1991), where an accused paid a fine and…

State v. Patterson

We note that, by filing his notice of appeal before paying his fine in full, defendant has preserved the…