From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hall

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 9, 1981
635 P.2d 681 (Or. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. G-81-14, CA A21111

Submitted on record and briefs October 2, 1981

Reversed and remanded for trial November 9, 1981

Appeal from District Court, Douglas County.

Ronald Poole, Judge.

Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Salem, William F. Gary, Solicitor General, and Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for appellant.

Daniel W. Seitz and Cegavske Seitz, Roseburg, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Roberts and Young, Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for trial.


The state appeals a trial court order suppressing evidence seized pursuant to a warrant. The trial court found the affidavit in support of the warrant insufficient. We find the challenged affidavit establishes probable cause. See United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102, 85 S Ct 741, 13 L Ed 2d 684 (1965); United States v. Allen, 588 F.2d 1100, 1106 (5th Cir), cert den sub nom Perkins v. United States, 441 U.S. 965, 99 S Ct 2415, 60 L Ed 2d 1071 (1979).

Reversed and remanded for trial.


Summaries of

State v. Hall

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 9, 1981
635 P.2d 681 (Or. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

State v. Hall

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. BRUCE DOUGLAS HALL, Respondent

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 9, 1981

Citations

635 P.2d 681 (Or. Ct. App. 1981)
635 P.2d 681