From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Halilovic

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Jan 26, 2016
Docket No. 43456 (Idaho Ct. App. Jan. 26, 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 43456 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 339

01-26-2016

STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MEHMED HALILOVIC, Defendant-Appellant.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Andrea W. Reynolds, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.


Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Richard D. Greenwood, District Judge. Judgment of conviction and sentence, affirmed. Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Andrea W. Reynolds, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and HUSKEY, Judge

____________________

PER CURIAM

Mehmed Halilovic pleaded guilty to lewd and lascivious conduct with a child under sixteen, felony, Idaho Code § 18-1508. The district court imposed a unified twenty-year sentence, with three years determinate. Halilovic filed an I.C.R. 35 motion, which the district court denied. Halilovic appeals.

Halilovic does not appeal from the denial of his I.C.R. 35 motion. --------

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Halilovic's judgment of conviction and sentence is affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Halilovic

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Jan 26, 2016
Docket No. 43456 (Idaho Ct. App. Jan. 26, 2016)
Case details for

State v. Halilovic

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MEHMED HALILOVIC…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Date published: Jan 26, 2016

Citations

Docket No. 43456 (Idaho Ct. App. Jan. 26, 2016)