From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Halfhill

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Apr 14, 2021
964 N.W.2d 27 (Iowa Ct. App. 2021)

Summary

In Halfhill, we noted that "[b]ecause the district court failed to recognize the issue of backdoor hearsay created by the question and answer, the court did not take any curative actions."

Summary of this case from State v. Dawson

Opinion

No. 19-2093

04-14-2021

STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bryan HALFHILL, Defendant-Appellant.

Joey T. Hoover of Hoover Law Firm P.L.L.C., Epworth, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Louis S. Sloven, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.



DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION See Iowa R. App. P. 6.904

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR NEW TRIAL.


Summaries of

State v. Halfhill

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Apr 14, 2021
964 N.W.2d 27 (Iowa Ct. App. 2021)

In Halfhill, we noted that "[b]ecause the district court failed to recognize the issue of backdoor hearsay created by the question and answer, the court did not take any curative actions."

Summary of this case from State v. Dawson
Case details for

State v. Halfhill

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BRYAN HALFHILL, Defendant-Appellant.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

Date published: Apr 14, 2021

Citations

964 N.W.2d 27 (Iowa Ct. App. 2021)

Citing Cases

State v. Halfhill

See State v. Halfhill, No. 19-2093, 2021 WL 1400761, at *1, *4 (Iowa Ct. App. Apr. 14, 2021). The…

State v. Halfhill

Halfhill was previously convicted of second-degree sexual abuse, lascivious acts with a child, and…