From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hale

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 30, 1996
682 So. 2d 613 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-03803.

October 30, 1996.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Diana M. Allen, J.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Patricia J. Hakes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Jeffrey M. Pearlman, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellee.


The State appeals the sentence imposed upon Ralph Hale, asserting that the trial court failed to follow the negotiated plea agreement. The State and Hale had entered into a plea agreement that called for a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines; however, the court did not impose the agreed upon sentence and instead imposed a different departure sentence. Because Hale's actual sentence was not the result of a legitimate plea bargain, the written departure reason is not supported by the record. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions to the trial court to either impose the sentence negotiated between Hall and the State or allow Hale to withdraw his plea.

Reversed and remanded.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and FULMER, J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Hale

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 30, 1996
682 So. 2d 613 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

State v. Hale

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. RALPH HALE, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 30, 1996

Citations

682 So. 2d 613 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

State v. Leighton

We conclude that it was a legitimate reason for a departure; however, the record does not support it.…

Dozier v. State

For there to be a legitimate reason for downward departure, there must actually be a plea bargain, that is,…