From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hal

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 17, 1999
974 P.2d 793 (Or. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

96-12-39650; CA A99004.

Argued and submitted November 20, 1998, appeal dismissed February 17, 1999.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

Roosevelt Robinson, Judge.

Andy Simrin, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was David E. Groom, Public Defender.

Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Haselton and Wollheim, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Appeal dismissed.


Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction, challenging only the trial court's imposition of a probation sentence consecutive to a sentence that included post-prison supervision. We heard oral argument and took the case under advisement. In the meantime, defendant filed a motion in the trial court to modify the judgment to correct an error in the sentence, pursuant to ORS 138.083. The trial court allowed the motion, granting defendant the same relief that she pursues in this appeal. The appeal is therefore moot and, on that ground, is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

State v. Hal

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 17, 1999
974 P.2d 793 (Or. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

State v. Hal

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. LACRECIA MICHELLE HAL, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 17, 1999

Citations

974 P.2d 793 (Or. Ct. App. 1999)
974 P.2d 793