Summary
seeking review by citing and quoting from foregoing portion of Petitioner's North Carolina Court of Appeals brief, "contend[ing] that the opinion below does not mention the Rule of Lenity argument," and asserting that his "Rule of Lenity argument is bolstered by reference to [State v. Eaton, 210 N.C. App. 142, 707 S.E.2d 642, review denied, 365 N.C. N.C. 202, 710 S.E.2d 25 (2011)] which the [North Carolina] Court of Appeals relied on for its ruling"
Summary of this case from Haizlip v. PooleOpinion
No. 329P14.
12-18-2014
STATE of North Carolina v. Dwayne Demont HAIZLIP.
Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Southern Pines, for Haizlip, Dwayne Demont. James D. Concepcion, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina. J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.
Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Southern Pines, for Haizlip, Dwayne Demont.
James D. Concepcion, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.
J. Douglas Henderson, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th of September 2014 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A–31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
“Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of December 2014.”
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 9th of September 2014 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
“Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of December 2014.”