State v. Hagood

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. John Allen Hagood, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 11, 2012

Appellate Case No. 2011-185626 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 11, 2012)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2011-185626 Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-407

07-11-2012

The State, Respondent, v. John Allen Hagood, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Assistant Deputy Attorney General David A. Spencer, all of Columbia; and Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Greenville County

C. Victor Pyle, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Assistant Deputy Attorney General David A. Spencer, all of Columbia; and Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : John Allen Hagood appeals his convictions of first-degree burglary and grand larceny. Hagood argues the trial court erred in admitting into evidence a statement he made to investigators confessing to the charges. We affirm¹ pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: State v. Mitchell, 330 S.C. 189, 193 n.3, 498 S.E.2d 642, 644 n.3 (1998) (holding "a ruling in limine is not final, and unless an objection is made at the time the evidence is offered and a final ruling procured, the issue is not preserved for review").

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

AFFIRMED.

PIEPER, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.