From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hager

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
Aug 8, 2019
2019 Ohio 3191 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 108233

08-08-2019

STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DEBRA HAGER, Defendant-Appellant.

Appearances: Mark A. Stanton, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and John T. Martin and Autumn Basil, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant. Michael C. O'Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Justin Washburne, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.


JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION JUDGMENT: VACATED IN PART AND REMANDED Criminal Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas
Case No. CR-17-621417-A

Appearances:

Mark A. Stanton, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and John T. Martin and Autumn Basil, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant. Michael C. O'Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Justin Washburne, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, J.:

{¶ 1} Appellant Debra Hager was indicted by a Cuyahoga County Grand Jury charging multiple counts of both tampering with records and identity fraud. She entered pleas of guilty to the four counts of identity fraud which involved two victims and was ultimately sentenced to 11 months in the Cuyahoga County Jail on each count, which were ordered to be served concurrent to one another, as well as to a sentence imposed in a second case. In addition, she was ordered, over objection, to pay restitution in the amounts of $28,800 to one victim and $6,000 to the other.

{¶ 2} Hager has appealed, setting forth one assignment of error, to-wit:

The trial court erred when it failed to hold a hearing despite the defense having objected to the amount of restitution ordered.

{¶ 3} In response to appellant's claim, the state of Ohio has conceded the error and admits that sufficient evidence was not provided to support the restitution order totaling $34,800.

{¶ 4} This matter is remanded to the trial court to conduct a restitution hearing.

{¶ 5} Case is vacated in part and remanded to the lower court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is ordered that appellant recover from appellee the costs herein taxed.

The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.

It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the common pleas court to carry this judgment into execution.

A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. /s/_________
EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, JUDGE SEAN C. GALLAGHER, P.J., and
MICHELLE J. SHEEHAN, J., CONCUR


Summaries of

State v. Hager

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
Aug 8, 2019
2019 Ohio 3191 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

State v. Hager

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DEBRA HAGER, Defendant-Appellant.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

Date published: Aug 8, 2019

Citations

2019 Ohio 3191 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)