From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hackler

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jun 2, 1995
532 N.W.2d 559 (Minn. 1995)

Summary

holding that second-degree assault is an included offense of first-degree assault on the basis of the same criminal act for purposes of Minn. Stat. § 609.04, despite that proof of the latter does not necessarily prove the former

Summary of this case from State v. Mayo

Opinion

No. C9-94-1626.

June 2, 1995.

Appeal from the District Court.


ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Larry Richard Hackler for further review of the unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is, granted for the limited purpose of vacating petitioner's conviction of assault in the second degree on the ground that it is a lesser included offense of the offense of assault in the first degree, of which petitioner was convicted on the basis of the same conduct. Minn.Stat. § 609.04 forbids two convictions of the same offense or one offense and a lesser included offense on the basis of the same criminal act. The court of appeals reasoned that assault in the second degree is not a "necessarily included offense" of assault in the first degree. However, section 609.04 makes it clear that the term "included offense" includes "a lesser degree of the same crime." Contrary to what the court of appeals said, the fact that the lesser offense is not necessarily proved by proof of the commission of the greater offense does not mean that the lesser offense is not an included offense under section 609.04. If the lesser offense is a lesser degree of the same crime or a lesser degree of a multi-tier statutory scheme dealing with a particular subject, then it is an "included offense" under section 609.04. State v. Tenhoff, 322 N.W.2d 354, 356-57 (Minn. 1982); Matter of Welfare of K.A.Z., 266 N.W.2d 167, 170 (Minn. 1978); and State v. Leinweber, 303 Minn. 414, 415, 421, 228 N.W.2d 120, 122, 125 (1975). In summary, petitioner's conviction of attempted first-degree murder and of assault in the first degree are affirmed but petitioner's conviction of assault in the second degree is vacated (as was the conviction of attempted second-degree murder). Affirmed as modified.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alexander M. Keith Chief Justice


Summaries of

State v. Hackler

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jun 2, 1995
532 N.W.2d 559 (Minn. 1995)

holding that second-degree assault is an included offense of first-degree assault on the basis of the same criminal act for purposes of Minn. Stat. § 609.04, despite that proof of the latter does not necessarily prove the former

Summary of this case from State v. Mayo

affirming defendant's conviction for first-degree assault but vacating conviction of second-degree assault because that crime is lesser-included offense of first-degree assault

Summary of this case from State v. Matelski

vacating second-degree assault conviction because the defendant was also convicted of first-degree assault

Summary of this case from State v. Engel

vacating conviction for assault in second degree when defendant also convicted of first degree assault for same conduct

Summary of this case from State v. Calvillo

In Hackler, the supreme court concluded that second-degree assault is a lesser-included offense of first-degree assault even though proof of first-degree assault does not necessarily prove second-degree assault.

Summary of this case from State v. Barta
Case details for

State v. Hackler

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Larry Richard HACKLER, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Jun 2, 1995

Citations

532 N.W.2d 559 (Minn. 1995)

Citing Cases

State v. Lester

"If the lesser offense is a lesser degree of the same crime or a lesser degree of a multi-tier statutory…

Wells v. State

In State v. Hackler, the supreme court concluded that second-degree assault is a lesser-included offense of…