From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Guzman-Pliego

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 2, 2024
No. 2024-UP-334 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 2, 2024)

Opinion

2024-UP-334 Appellate Case 2023-000263

10-02-2024

The State, Respondent, v. Jose Martin Guzman-Pliego, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, and Jose Martin Guzman-Pliego, pro se, both for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted September 1, 2024.

Appeal From Pickens County Perry H. Gravely, Circuit Court Judge.

Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, and Jose Martin Guzman-Pliego, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and VINSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Guzman-Pliego

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 2, 2024
No. 2024-UP-334 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 2, 2024)
Case details for

State v. Guzman-Pliego

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Jose Martin Guzman-Pliego, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 2, 2024

Citations

No. 2024-UP-334 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 2, 2024)