Summary
In Grundstein, the trial court had permitted the prosecution to reopen its case following the close of the evidence and after counsel for both the state and the defense had made their principal arguments to the jury.
Summary of this case from Columbus v. GrantOpinion
No. 29577
Decided June 16, 1943.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Receiving stolen property — Section 12450, General Code — Evidence of value — Prices issued by Office of Price Administration — Evidence permitted after argument — Abuse of discretion, when — Equal protection of the laws — Fair and impartial trial — Sections 2 and 10, Article 1, Constitution — Article VI and Section 1, Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals of Franklin county.
Mr. Ralph J. Bartlett, prosecuting attorney, Mr. Forrest F. Smith and Mr. T. Vincent Martin, for appellee.
Mr. Stanley B. Schwartz, for appellant.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, BELL and TURNER, JJ., coucur.
WILLIAMS, J., not participating.