Opinion
No. 2013AP414–CR.
2013-10-30
STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Alexander D. GRUBOR, Defendant–Appellant.
The trial court also acknowledged that at the time of sentencing, it believed that Grubor was eligible for the ERP, and had considered the program appropriate in this case: Based on the lack of pre-release intensive institutional programming, the trial court determined that sentence modification was not justified or appropriate.