From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Griffin

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
Jan 23, 2020
301 Or. App. 839 (Or. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

A167728

01-23-2020

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Scott Robert GRIFFIN, Defendant-Appellant.

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Sarah De La Cruz, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Christopher Page, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.


Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Sarah De La Cruz, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Christopher Page, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Armstrong, Presiding Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge, and Kistler, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM

Defendant, who was convicted of fourth-degree assault, ORS 163.160, argues on appeal, among other things, that the trial court plainly erred in imposing a "Chapter 163 Assessment" of $500. The state concedes the error and concedes that the assessment should be reversed. We agree, accept the concession, and exercise our discretion to correct the error, for the reasons set forth in State v. Rowling , 259 Or.App. 290, 313 P.3d 386 (2013) (correcting similar error). We reject defendant’s remaining arguments without discussion.

Portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay "Chapter 163 Assessment" reversed; otherwise affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Griffin

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
Jan 23, 2020
301 Or. App. 839 (Or. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

State v. Griffin

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SCOTT ROBERT GRIFFIN…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

Date published: Jan 23, 2020

Citations

301 Or. App. 839 (Or. Ct. App. 2020)
456 P.3d 384