From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Green

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Apr 30, 2014
852 N.W.2d 21 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014)

Summary

finding no error in the failure to give the inconsistency instruction cited above where the district court gave a credibility instruction and allowed the defendant "to argue any alleged inconsistencies"

Summary of this case from State v. Guill

Opinion

No. 13–0653.

2014-04-30

STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Darwin Laquell GREEN, Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Webster County, Kurt L. Wilke, Judge. Defendant appeals his conviction for robbery in the second degree. AFFIRMED. Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, and Robert Ranschau, Assistant Appellate Defender, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Martha E. Trout, Assistant Attorney General, and Ricki Osborn, County Attorney, for appellee.



Summaries of

State v. Green

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Apr 30, 2014
852 N.W.2d 21 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014)

finding no error in the failure to give the inconsistency instruction cited above where the district court gave a credibility instruction and allowed the defendant "to argue any alleged inconsistencies"

Summary of this case from State v. Guill
Case details for

State v. Green

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Darwin Laquell GREEN…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Apr 30, 2014

Citations

852 N.W.2d 21 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014)

Citing Cases

State v. Guill

We discern no error because the substance of the proposed instruction was encompassed in another instruction…