From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Green

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 2, 2007
44 A.D.3d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2006-02836.

October 2, 2007.

Appeal by the defendant from a determination of the County Court, Suffolk County (Crecca, J.), dated March 8, 2006, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Steven A. Hovani of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Florio and Dillon, JJ.


Ordered that the determination is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There was clear and convincing evidence to support the County Court's determination to designate the defendant a level three sex offender ( see People v Fisher, 36 AD3d 880; People v Inghilleri, 21 AD3d 404; People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545). There is no merit to the defendant's contention that he was entitled to a downward departure from this risk level ( see People v Abdullah, 31 AD3d 515; People v Ventura, 24 AD3d 527; People v Dexter, 21 AD3d 403).


Summaries of

State v. Green

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 2, 2007
44 A.D.3d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

State v. Green

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RANDY GREEN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 2, 2007

Citations

44 A.D.3d 635 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 7416
841 N.Y.S.2d 893

Citing Cases

People v. Imperato

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. There was clear and convincing evidence…

People v. Green

Decided December 18, 2007. Appeal from the 2d Dept: 44 AD3d 635. Motions for Leave to Appeal…