From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Green

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jun 25, 2014
Appellate Case No. 2013-000441 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 25, 2014)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2013-000441 Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-244

06-25-2014

The State, Respondent, v. Rico Green, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Douglas A. Barfield, Jr., of Lancaster, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.


Appeal From Lancaster County

Brooks P. Goldsmith, Circuit Court Judge


AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Douglas A. Barfield, Jr., of Lancaster, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Rico Green appeals his guilty pleas for trafficking in cocaine ten to twenty-eight grams and trafficking in cocaine base ten to twenty-eight grams, arguing the circuit court erred in accepting his impermissibly conditional guilty pleas. We hold the circuit court did not err in accepting Green's guilty pleas. "[I]n South Carolina, a guilty plea constitutes a waiver of nonjurisdictional defects and claims of violations of constitutional rights." State v. Rice, 401 S.C. 330, 331-32, 737 S.E.2d 485, 485 (2013). Although the circuit court may not accept a conditional guilty plea, Green never sought to preserve an issue or subject his guilty pleas to any condition. Instead, the record reveals Green simply decided to plead guilty after the circuit court denied his pre-trial motions. Accordingly, the circuit court did not err in accepting Green's guilty pleas. AFFIRMED.

See In re Johnny Lee W., 371 S.C. 217, 220, 638 S.E.2d 682, 684 (2006) ("A [circuit] court may not accept a conditional guilty plea.").

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
--------

HUFF, THOMAS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Green

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jun 25, 2014
Appellate Case No. 2013-000441 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 25, 2014)
Case details for

State v. Green

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Rico Green, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 25, 2014

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2013-000441 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 25, 2014)