From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Gray

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct 27, 2020
610 S.W.3d 413 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

WD 83386

10-27-2020

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Corey Nathaniel GRAY, Appellant.

Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, and Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent. Nancy A. McKerrow, Columbia, MO, Attorney for Appellant.


Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, and Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Nancy A. McKerrow, Columbia, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Before Division Two: Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, and Thomas H. Newton and Karen King Mitchell, Judges

Order

Per Curiam:

Corey Gray appeals, following a jury trial, his convictions of first-degree statutory sodomy, § 566.062, and first-degree child molestation, § 566.067, for which he was sentenced to consecutive terms of fifteen and five years’ imprisonment, respectively. Gray raises a single claim on appeal; he argues that the trial court erred in overruling his objection and allowing Victim's mother to testify about the change in Victim's behavior before and after the offenses. Gray argues that this testimony invaded the province of the jury, was more prejudicial than probative, improperly bolstered Victim's credibility, and was irrelevant. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Gray

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct 27, 2020
610 S.W.3d 413 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

State v. Gray

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Corey Nathaniel GRAY, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Oct 27, 2020

Citations

610 S.W.3d 413 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Citing Cases

Gray v. State

State v. Gray, WD 83386 (Mo. App. W.D. Oct. 27, …