From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Gray

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Jan 9, 2001
41 S.W.3d 527 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED77716

Order Filed: January 9, 2001 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 22, 2001. Application to Transfer Denied April 24, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HONORABLE BARBARA WALLACE

Nancy A. McKerrow, 3402 Buttonwood, Columbia, MO 65201-3724, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, John Munson Morris, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO 65102, Emily K. Wiggins, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before: Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J., Paul J. Simon and Sherri B. Sullivan, JJ.

ORDER



Defendant, Ronnie L. Gray, appeals from a conviction for first-degree murder, Section 565.020.1 RSMo (1994); first-degree robbery, Section 569.020; and two counts of armed criminal action, Section 571.015. Defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment without probation or parole for the murder charge, to a concurrent term of thirty years for the robbery charge, and to two consecutive terms of thirty years for the armed criminal action charges. Defendant alleges that the trial court erred in: (1) overruling his objection to the prosecutor's use of peremptory challenges to remove four African-American venirepersons; (2) permitting the State to call Laverne Hazlett's ("Victim") mother and sister to testify; and (3) admitting into evidence photographs of the Victim taken before and during the autopsy. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that: (1) the trial court's denial of all of Defendant's Batson challenges does not constitute clear error; and (2) the trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling Defendant's objections to the disputed testimony and photographs. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

All statutory references are to RSMo (1994) unless otherwise noted.
Lawrence E. Mooney,P.J. Paul J. Simon, J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., concurring.


Summaries of

State v. Gray

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Jan 9, 2001
41 S.W.3d 527 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

State v. Gray

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RONNIE L. GRAY…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Jan 9, 2001

Citations

41 S.W.3d 527 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Gray v. State

Movant appealed the judgment of his conviction and sentence and this Court affirmed. State v. Gray, 41 S.W.3d…