From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Grant

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
Jan 23, 2017
No. 73919-1-I (Wash. Ct. App. Jan. 23, 2017)

Opinion

73919-1-I

01-23-2017

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. TRAVIS V. GRANT Appellant.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Dwyer, J.

The State concedes error in this appeal. We accept the State's concession.

The State concedes that defense counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel in failing to object to imposition of some of the fees and for failing to inform the court that some of them weren't mandatory upon a showing of indigency. The matter should be remanded for a hearing regarding all legal financial obligations.
Br. of Resp't at 2.

"Therefore, this matter should be remanded for the court to re-address the imposition of legal financial obligations on both the DUI and felony convictions." Br. of Resp't at 7. We agree. This is the remedy that we afford.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

State v. Grant

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
Jan 23, 2017
No. 73919-1-I (Wash. Ct. App. Jan. 23, 2017)
Case details for

State v. Grant

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. TRAVIS V. GRANT Appellant.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE

Date published: Jan 23, 2017

Citations

No. 73919-1-I (Wash. Ct. App. Jan. 23, 2017)