From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Granger

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Nov 18, 1977
261 N.W.2d 335 (Minn. 1977)

Opinion

No. 47134.

November 18, 1977.

Appeal from the District Court, Hennepin County, Bruce C. Stone and Patrick J. Fitzgerald, JJ.

Fitzgerald Crandall and William A. Crandall, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Warren Spannaus, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Gary W. Flakne, County Atty., Vernon E. Bergstrom, Chief, Appellate Div., David W. Larson and Phebe S. Haugen, Asst. County Attys., and Lee W. Barry, Law Clerk, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.


Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of a charge of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree, Minn.St. 609.342(c)(d), and was sentenced by the trial court to a limited maximum term of 7 years in prison. On this appeal from judgment of conviction, defendant contends that there was, as a matter of law, insufficient evidence to justify a verdict of guilty. There is no merit to this contention. Contrary to what defendant argues, corroboration of the complainant's testimony was not required. Minn.St. 609.347, subd. 1, provides that "[i]n a prosecution under sections 609.342 to 609.346, the testimony of the complainant need not be corroborated." Even if there were a corroboration requirement, it would not have benefited defendant because the complainant's testimony was in fact corroborated. State v. Ani, Minn., 257 N.W.2d 699 (1977).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Granger

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Nov 18, 1977
261 N.W.2d 335 (Minn. 1977)
Case details for

State v. Granger

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Wilbert Lee GRANGER, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Nov 18, 1977

Citations

261 N.W.2d 335 (Minn. 1977)