From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Gordon

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 8, 1958
107 So. 2d 401 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1958)

Opinion

No. 995.

December 8, 1958.

Robert B. Huffaker, State Atty., Bartow, for petitioner.

Bentley, Shafer Miller, Lakeland, and Martin Martin, Plant City, for respondents.


The petitioner having filed in this Court a suggestion for the issuance of a writ of prohibition and applied for a rule nisi thereon, and the Court having considered the suggestion and argument of counsel, it is

Ordered and adjudged that the application for rule nisi be and the same is hereby denied, and the suggestion for writ of prohibition is hereby dismissed, for the reasons that the Circuit Judge sought to be prohibited is not made a party to these proceedings, and the petitioner has failed to comply with the provisions of Section 80.06, Florida Statutes 1957, F.S.A., and Rule 4.5, subd. d, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A. The dismissal of the suggestion is not to be considered as a determination by the Court of the merits of this cause, and the Court suggests that if further proceedings are contemplated, consideration be given to the opinions of the Supreme Court of Florida in the cases of Groover v. Walker, Fla. 1956, 88 So.2d 312, and Robinson v. Great Southern Trucking Company, Fla. 1957, 95 So.2d 418.


Summaries of

State v. Gordon

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 8, 1958
107 So. 2d 401 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1958)
Case details for

State v. Gordon

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. H.P. GORDON, JAMES L. BUSBEE, ROLLIE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 8, 1958

Citations

107 So. 2d 401 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1958)

Citing Cases

Orange County v. Davis

Accordingly, both the appeal and cross-appeal are hereby As previously noted, if Davis desired to contest the…