From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Gordon

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 2, 2021
339 Conn. 913 (Conn. 2021)

Opinion

11-02-2021

STATE of Connecticut v. Tamara GORDON

Melissa E. Patterson, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition. Megan L. Wade, assigned counsel, and Emily Graner Sexton, assigned counsel, in opposition.


Melissa E. Patterson, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.

Megan L. Wade, assigned counsel, and Emily Graner Sexton, assigned counsel, in opposition.

The state's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 206 Conn. App. 70, 259 A.3d 676 (AC 42039), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court violated the defendant's right to confrontation when it admitted testimony affirming that the alleged victim had consented to the police investigation?

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the state had failed to establish that the claimed confrontation clause violation was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?"

ROBINSON, C. J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

State v. Gordon

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 2, 2021
339 Conn. 913 (Conn. 2021)
Case details for

State v. Gordon

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Tamara GORDON

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Nov 2, 2021

Citations

339 Conn. 913 (Conn. 2021)
262 A.3d 135