From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Gordon

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Dec 7, 1993
865 S.W.2d 896 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

Nos. 61806, 63489.

December 7, 1993.

APPEAL FROM CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS; ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., AND DANIEL T. TILLMAN, JUDGES.

Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Appellate Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joanne E. Beal, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.


ORDER


Defendant appeals his conviction, by a jury, of possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202, RSMo Supp. 1992. He was sentenced by the court as a prior and persistent, class X, minimum term offender and a prior and persistent drug offender. He also appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. A written opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rule 30.25(b); Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

State v. Gordon

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Dec 7, 1993
865 S.W.2d 896 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

State v. Gordon

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT, v. LAMONT GORDON…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Dec 7, 1993

Citations

865 S.W.2d 896 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)