From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Gooler

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Feb 24, 1984
344 N.W.2d 404 (Minn. 1984)

Opinion

No. C9-83-1145.

February 24, 1984.

Appeal from the District Court, Anoka County, John Dablow, J.

C. Paul Jones, State Public Defender, Brian I. Rademacher, Asst. Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Robert Johnson, County Atty., Richard A. Trachy, Asst. County Atty., Anoka, Hubert H. Humphrey III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


This is a sentencing appeal raising an issue concerning the propriety of a durational departure imposed but not executed by the sentencing court following revocation of a stay of imposition of sentence. The parties agree that the presumptive sentence for the offense (attempted burglary) by a person with defendant's criminal history score at the time of the original sentencing (zero) is 1 year and 1 day stayed. The trial court, in imposing a 2 1/2-year sentence did not give any reasons for the departure. Further, as the state concedes in its brief, the record on appeal does not support the departure. Under the circumstances, we reduce defendant's sentence duration from 2 1/2 years to 1 year and 1 day.

Affirmed as modified.


Summaries of

State v. Gooler

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Feb 24, 1984
344 N.W.2d 404 (Minn. 1984)
Case details for

State v. Gooler

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Stephen Edward GOOLER, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Feb 24, 1984

Citations

344 N.W.2d 404 (Minn. 1984)

Citing Cases

State v. Mattson

Where the record does not support upward departure, sentence is properly reduced. State v. Gooler, 344 N.W.2d…