From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Good

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 8, 2019
2019-UP-161 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 8, 2019)

Opinion

2019-UP-161

05-08-2019

The State, Respondent, v. Nathan Good, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2017-002570

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant. General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted April 1, 2019

Appeal From Anderson County R. Scott Sprouse, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Good

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 8, 2019
2019-UP-161 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 8, 2019)
Case details for

State v. Good

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Nathan Good, Appellant. Appellate Case No…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: May 8, 2019

Citations

2019-UP-161 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 8, 2019)