Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

State v. Glenn

190 Wis. 2d 155 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
State v. Glenn

2 Citing cases

  1. State v. Glenn

    199 Wis. 2d 575 (Wis. 1996)   Cited 22 times   2 Legal Analyses

    For the plaintiff-respondent the cause was argued by Stephen W. Kleinmaier, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle, attorney general. (Modifying and affirming 190 Wis.2d 155, 526 N.W.2d 752 (Ct.App. 1994).) ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J.

  2. State v. Below

    2011 WI App. 64 (Wis. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 17 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Below, we rejected the defendant’s arguments that the use of the substantial factor instruction was grounds for reversal, explaining that "the showing required under Wisconsin law" is whether the defendant’s actions were a substantial factor in causing the victim’s death.

    That is the showing required under Wisconsin law and the State proved it beyond a reasonable doubt. See State v. Oimen, 184 Wis. 2d 423, 435, 516 N.W.2d 399 (1994); see also Cranmore v. State, 85 Wis. 2d 722, 771-75, 271 N.W.2d' 402 (Ct. App. 1978); State v. Serebin, 119 Wis. 2d 837, 846-47, 350 N.W.2d 65 (1984); State v. Glenn, 190 Wis. 2d 155, 168, 526 N.W.2d 752 (Ct. App. 1994); State v. Block, 170 Wis. 2d 676, 682-84, 489 N.W.2d 715 (Ct. App. 1992). ¶ 27.