From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Gingerich

COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY
Mar 19, 2018
2018 Ohio 1013 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

CASE NO. CA2017-09-145

03-19-2018

STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PATRICK RAY GINGERICH, Defendant-Appellant.

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Government Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, OH 45011-6057, for plaintiff-appellee Christopher Paul Frederick, Suite 550, 300 High Street, Hamilton, OH 45011, for defendant-appellant


DECISION

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Case No. CR2017-020-0251 Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Government Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, OH 45011-6057, for plaintiff-appellee Christopher Paul Frederick, Suite 550, 300 High Street, Hamilton, OH 45011, for defendant-appellant Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel.

{¶2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Patrick Ray Gingerich, has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists two potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

S. POWELL, P.J., RINGLAND and HENDRICKSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Gingerich

COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY
Mar 19, 2018
2018 Ohio 1013 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

State v. Gingerich

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PATRICK RAY GINGERICH…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY

Date published: Mar 19, 2018

Citations

2018 Ohio 1013 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)