From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Gilmore

Court of Appeals of Georgia, Second Division
Jan 27, 2022
No. A20A0189 (Ga. Ct. App. Jan. 27, 2022)

Opinion

A20A0189

01-27-2022

THE STATE v. GILMORE.


MILLER, P. J., MERCIER, J., and PHIPPS, SENIOR APPELLATE JUDGE

MERCIER, JUDGE.

In State v. Gilmore, 355 Ga.App. 536 (844 S.E.2d 877) (2020), this Court affirmed the trial court's denial of the State's motions to admit a video recording of a controlled drug buy. In State v. Gilmore, 312 Ga. 289 (862 S.E.2d 499) (2021), the Georgia Supreme Court reversed our decision, holding that the admission of the video recording was not barred by the Confrontation Clause, and it remanded this case for further proceedings. We therefore vacate our earlier opinion, adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court as our own, and reverse the trial court's judgment.

Judgment reversed.

Miller, P. J., and Senior Appellate Judge Herbert E. Phipps concur.


Summaries of

State v. Gilmore

Court of Appeals of Georgia, Second Division
Jan 27, 2022
No. A20A0189 (Ga. Ct. App. Jan. 27, 2022)
Case details for

State v. Gilmore

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE v. GILMORE.

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia, Second Division

Date published: Jan 27, 2022

Citations

No. A20A0189 (Ga. Ct. App. Jan. 27, 2022)