From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Gilcrease

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Feb 13, 2019
567 S.W.3d 298 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. ED 106195

02-13-2019

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ralph V. GILCREASE, Appellant.

FOR APPELLANT: Ellen H. Flottman, Public Defender’s Office, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203. FOR RESPONDENT: Eric Schmitt, Attorney General, Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.


FOR APPELLANT: Ellen H. Flottman, Public Defender’s Office, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203.

FOR RESPONDENT: Eric Schmitt, Attorney General, Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ralph V. Gilcrease appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of three counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, two counts of second-degree statutory sodomy, one count of enticement of a child, one count of first-degree child molestation, and two counts of second-degree child molestation. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Gilcrease

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Feb 13, 2019
567 S.W.3d 298 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

State v. Gilcrease

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ralph V. GILCREASE, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Feb 13, 2019

Citations

567 S.W.3d 298 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Citing Cases

Gilcrease v. State

Appellant directly appealed from his convictions and sentences, and this Court affirmed. See State v.…

Gilcrease v. State

Appellant directly appealed from his convictions and sentences, and this Court affirmed. See State v. …