From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Giedd

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II
Mar 16, 2021
No. 54364-8-II (Wash. Ct. App. Mar. 16, 2021)

Opinion

54364-8-II

03-16-2021

STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JACOB TODD GIEDD, Appellant.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

CRUSER, J.

Jacob Todd Giedd appeals his sentence for unlawful possession of a controlled substance (methamphetamine). Giedd argues, and the State concedes, that he is entitled to withdraw his plea, or be sentenced under his correct standard range, because his plea agreement was based on an incorrect standard sentencing range. Since the briefing was completed in this case, our supreme court issued its decision in State v. Blake, No. 96873-0 (Wash. Feb. 25, 2021), https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/968730.pdf. In light of the decision in Blake, we remand this matter to the superior court to address the continued validity of Giedd's conviction. In light of our remand, we need not address Giedd's "Emergency Motion to Vacate Drug Conviction." This motion is more properly addressed in the superior court.

CONCLUSION

We remand this matter to the superior court to address the validity of Giedd's conviction in light of State v. Blake.

A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040, it is so ordered.

We concur: WORSWICK, P.J., GLASGOW, J.


Summaries of

State v. Giedd

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II
Mar 16, 2021
No. 54364-8-II (Wash. Ct. App. Mar. 16, 2021)
Case details for

State v. Giedd

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JACOB TODD GIEDD, Appellant.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II

Date published: Mar 16, 2021

Citations

No. 54364-8-II (Wash. Ct. App. Mar. 16, 2021)