From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Bronczyk v. Gaul

Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
Aug 5, 2016
2016 Ohio 5335 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 104223

08-05-2016

STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. JOSEPH J. BRONCZYK RELATOR v. HON. DANIEL GAUL, JUDGE RESPONDENT

FOR RELATOR Joseph J. Bronczyk, pro se Inmate No. A594815 Richland Correctional Institution P.O. Box 8107 Mansfield, Ohio 44901 ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor By: James E. Moss Assistant County Prosecutor The Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113


JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED Writ of Procedendo
Motion No. 495047
Order No. 497816

FOR RELATOR

Joseph J. Bronczyk, pro se
Inmate No. A594815
Richland Correctional Institution
P.O. Box 8107
Mansfield, Ohio 44901

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT

Timothy J. McGinty
Cuyahoga County Prosecutor
By: James E. Moss
Assistant County Prosecutor
The Justice Center
1200 Ontario Street
Cleveland, Ohio 44113 SEAN C. GALLAGHER, J.:

{¶1} Relator, Joseph J. Bronczyk, commenced this procedendo action against the respondent, Judge Daniel Gaul of the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, to compel him to issue a ruling on a motion he filed on November 2, 2015, in State v. Bronczyk, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-10-540345-A. Through the motion, Bronczyk was requesting leave to file a delayed motion for a new trial pursuant to Crim.R. 33.

{¶2} Respondent moved for summary judgment on the grounds of mootness. Attached to the dispositive motion was a copy of a journal entry, file stamped March 21, 2016, signed by the respondent that denied the motion. This entry establishes that the respondent proceeded to judgment and that the relator has received his requested relief, a judgment. The relator never filed a response to respondent's motion for summary judgment. This writ action is moot._State ex rel. Fontanella v. Kantos, 117 Ohio St.3d 514, 2008-Ohio-1431, 885 N.E.2d 220, ¶ 6.

{¶3} Respondent's motion for summary judgment is granted, and the application for a writ of procedendo is denied. Respondent to pay costs; costs waived. This court directs the clerk of courts to serve all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B)._

{¶4} Writ denied. SEAN C. GALLAGHER, JUDGE EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, P.J., and
ANITA LASTER MAYS, J., CONCUR


Summaries of

State ex rel. Bronczyk v. Gaul

Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
Aug 5, 2016
2016 Ohio 5335 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

State ex rel. Bronczyk v. Gaul

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. JOSEPH J. BRONCZYK RELATOR v. HON. DANIEL GAUL…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

Date published: Aug 5, 2016

Citations

2016 Ohio 5335 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)