From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Garratt

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 14, 1994
885 P.2d 757 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

92-07-33916; CA A78088

Argued and submitted October 27, 1994

Remanded for entry of corrected judgment and resentencing December 14, 1994

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

Stephen L. Gallagher, Jr., Judge.

David K. Allen, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Janet A. Klapstein, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Haselton, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Remanded for entry of corrected judgment and resentencing.


Defendant appeals from his convictions for solicitation to commit perjury and conspiracy to commit perjury. ORS 162.065; ORS 161.435; ORS 161.450. The trial court imposed a sentence of 12 months of incarceration, with 36 months of post-prison supervision, on the conspiracy count and five years of probation on the solicitation count. Defendant argues on appeal that because ORS 161.485(2) precludes conviction of more than one inchoate crime for conduct aimed at the culmination of the same crime, the two offenses merged as a matter of law.

ORS 161.485(2) provides:

"A person shall not be convicted of more than one offense defined by ORS 161.405 [attempt], 161.435 [solicitation] and 161.450 [conspiracy] for conduct designed to commit or to culminate in commission of the same crime."

Defendant did not object to the trial court's failure to merge the two counts; however, on appeal, he argues that the error is apparent on the face of the record and requests that we exercise our discretion and review the error. ORAP 5.45(2). As the state concedes, defendant is correct that the error is one of law and is apparent on the face of the record. Particularly in view of the state's concession, we are persuaded to exercise our discretion to review the unpreserved error. State v. Jones, 129 Or. App. 413, 879 P.2d 881 (1994). We remand for entry of a corrected judgment imposing only one conviction and for resentencing.

Remanded for entry of a corrected judgment and resentencing.


Summaries of

State v. Garratt

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 14, 1994
885 P.2d 757 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

State v. Garratt

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. STEVEN DOUGLAS GARRATT, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 14, 1994

Citations

885 P.2d 757 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
885 P.2d 757

Citing Cases

State v. Scott

Nonetheless, the state concedes that the trial court erred in that regard, ORS 161.485(3), and that the error…