From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Galvan

SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA
Jul 17, 2020
306 Neb. 498 (Neb. 2020)

Opinion

Nos. S-19-623 S-19-624.

07-17-2020

STATE of Nebraska, appellee, v. Braden M. GALVAN, appellant.

Gerard A. Piccolo, Hall County Public Defender, for appellant. Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Melissa R. Vincent, Lincoln, for appellee.


Gerard A. Piccolo, Hall County Public Defender, for appellant.

Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Melissa R. Vincent, Lincoln, for appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, Papik, and Freudenberg, JJ.

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

Per Curiam. This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the appellee, State of Nebraska, concerning our opinion in State v. Galvan , 305 Neb. 513, 941 N.W.2d 183 (2020).

We overrule the motion, but modify the opinion as follows:

In the analysis section, under the subheading "Plain Error," we withdraw the first two sentences of the fifth paragraph, including footnotes 24 and 25. State v. Galvan , 305 Neb. at 521, 941 N.W.2d at 190.

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

FORMER OPINION MODIFIED.

MOTION FOR REHEARING OVERRULED .


Summaries of

State v. Galvan

SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA
Jul 17, 2020
306 Neb. 498 (Neb. 2020)
Case details for

State v. Galvan

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, v. BRADEN M. GALVAN, APPELLANT.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA

Date published: Jul 17, 2020

Citations

306 Neb. 498 (Neb. 2020)
945 N.W.2d 888

Citing Cases

State v. Lopez

Generally, it is within a trial court's discretion to direct that sentences imposed for separate crimes be…

State v. Woodruff

Plain error exists where there is an error, plainly evident from the record but not complained of at trial,…