From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Fritz

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Apr 23, 2007
138 Wn. App. 1017 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

Nos. 58712-9-I; 58783-8-I.

April 23, 2007.

Appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, Nos. 05-1-11230-8 and 05-1-11146-8, Philip G. Hubbard, Jr., and Jay V. White, JJ., entered August 14, 2006.


Reversed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.


In these appeals, Kody Fritz challenges the consecutive sentences imposed for various convictions under two different cause numbers. He

contends, and the State concedes, that because the sentences were imposed at the same hearing on the same day, and because the court did not impose an exceptional sentence, the court lacked authority to run the sentences consecutively. We accept the concession. See RCW 9.94A.589(1)(a); State v. Smith, 74 Wn. App. 844, 875 P.2d 1249 (1994). The sentences are reversed and remanded for imposition of concurrent sentences.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

State v. Fritz

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Apr 23, 2007
138 Wn. App. 1017 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

State v. Fritz

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. KODY JASON FRITZ, Appellant

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One

Date published: Apr 23, 2007

Citations

138 Wn. App. 1017 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007)
138 Wash. App. 1017