From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Freeman

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jun 5, 2019
2019-UP-200 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 5, 2019)

Opinion

2019-UP-200

06-05-2019

The State, Respondent, v. Fred Freeman, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2017-001833

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia; and Fred Freeman, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted May 1, 2019

Appeal From Berkeley County Maite Murphy, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia; and Fred Freeman, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, GEATHERS, and HILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Freeman

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jun 5, 2019
2019-UP-200 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 5, 2019)
Case details for

State v. Freeman

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Fred Freeman, Appellant. Appellate Case No…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jun 5, 2019

Citations

2019-UP-200 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 5, 2019)