From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Frase

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 5, 1999
87 Ohio St. 3d 1412 (Ohio 1999)

Opinion

No. 99-1779.

October 5, 1999.

Licking App. No. 99CA32.


Appellant has filed an untimely appeal of the court of appeals' decision affirming the trial court's denial of her motion for leave to file a delayed motion for a new trial, and a motion for delayed appeal. This appeal involves a civil, post-conviction matter and not an appeal of a felony case to which the provisions for delayed appeal in S.Ct.Prac.R. II(A)(4), apply. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motion for delayed appeal be, and hereby is, stricken.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that, in that appellant failed to perfect an appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(A)(1), this case be, and hereby is, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

State v. Frase

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 5, 1999
87 Ohio St. 3d 1412 (Ohio 1999)
Case details for

State v. Frase

Case Details

Full title:State v. Frase

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Oct 5, 1999

Citations

87 Ohio St. 3d 1412 (Ohio 1999)
717 N.E.2d 345

Citing Cases

State v. Bethel

{¶ 45} The state first suggests that Bethel's motion constitutes a collateral challenge simply because it was…