From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Foster

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 15, 1996
916 P.2d 886 (Or. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

95-421-MC; CA A90928

Submitted on record and briefs April 16, Reversed May 15, 1996

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County.

R.G. Davis, Judge.

Ronald K. Cue filed the brief for appellant.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Mary H. Williams, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Deits and De Muniz, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed.


Appellant appeals an order of civil commitment under ORS 426.005 et seq. She argues that there was not sufficient evidence from which the court could find that she was mentally ill under ORS 426.005(1)(d)(A)-(C). The state agrees that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that appellant meets any of the criteria for civil commitment. On our de novo review, State v. O'Neill, 274 Or. 59, 545 P.2d 97 (1976), we agree.

Reversed.


Summaries of

State v. Foster

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 15, 1996
916 P.2d 886 (Or. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

State v. Foster

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Sandra K. Foster, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: May 15, 1996

Citations

916 P.2d 886 (Or. Ct. App. 1996)
916 P.2d 886