Summary
expressing doubt as to jurors' ability to consider objectively voluntariness of confession
Summary of this case from State v. TindleOpinion
No. 10645
Opinion Filed October 28, 1919.
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Appeal and Error — Briefs — Necessity of Filing.
Where a cause has been regularly assigned for submission and plaintiff in error fails to file brief or to offer any excuse for not doing so, it will be presumed the appeal has been abandoned and the same will be dismissed.
Error from District Court, Creek County; M.L. Bozarth, Judge.
Mandamus by the State on the relation of the Board of County Commissioners of Creek County against P.O. Foster, Clerk, and others. Judgment for defendants, and relator brings error. Dismissed.
Earl Foster, County Attorney of Creek County, for plaintiffs in error.
Ernest B. Hughes, for defendants in error.
This cause was advanced on motion of the county attorney and assigned for submission. Plaintiff in error has failed to file brief, as required by rule 7 of this court, or to offer any excuse for not doing so.
The appeal is therefore dismissed.