From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Foster

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 15, 1987
505 So. 2d 658 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 85-2717.

April 15, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Donald C. Evans, J.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James A. Young, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.

No Appearance for appellees.


We affirm the order discharging defendant on speedy trial grounds. Defendant was not brought to trial within ten days after the hearing on his motion for discharge. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(i)(4). The state did not timely raise with the trial court, as it was the state's burden to do, its argument that the hearing had been timely held and that the trial judge should have scheduled the trial within ten days thereafter. See Apolinari v. Ulmer, 483 So.2d 75, 77 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

LEHAN, A.C.J., and HALL and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Foster

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 15, 1987
505 So. 2d 658 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

State v. Foster

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. MARIAN P. FOSTER AND CECIL MATHIS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 15, 1987

Citations

505 So. 2d 658 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

State v. Dorian

The state, however, failed to raise this point below and has accordingly waived the issue for appellate…