From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Foster

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 2, 2024
No. 2024-UP-323 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 2, 2024)

Opinion

2024-UP-323 Appellate Case 2022-001274

10-02-2024

The State, Respondent, v. Dylan Trey Foster, Appellant.

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted September 1, 2024

Appeal From Greenville County Perry H. Gravely, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

WILLIAMS, C.J., and MCDONALD and TURNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Foster

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 2, 2024
No. 2024-UP-323 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 2, 2024)
Case details for

State v. Foster

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Dylan Trey Foster, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 2, 2024

Citations

No. 2024-UP-323 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 2, 2024)