From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Foreman

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Jan 21, 2021
957 N.W.2d 38 (Iowa Ct. App. 2021)

Summary

discerning no need to decide whether mutual combat theory instruction was appropriately given because the record and the verdicts "negat[ed] any plausible likelihood Foreman was found guilty based on the actions of anyone other than Foreman"

Summary of this case from Watson v. United States

Opinion

No. 19-0878

01-21-2021

STATE of Iowa, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Travis Jamal FOREMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

Alexander Smith of Parrish Kruidenier Dunn Boles Gribble Gentry Brown & Bergmann L.L.P., Des Moines, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Louis S. Sloven, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION See Iowa R. App. P. 6.904

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

State v. Foreman

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Jan 21, 2021
957 N.W.2d 38 (Iowa Ct. App. 2021)

discerning no need to decide whether mutual combat theory instruction was appropriately given because the record and the verdicts "negat[ed] any plausible likelihood Foreman was found guilty based on the actions of anyone other than Foreman"

Summary of this case from Watson v. United States
Case details for

State v. Foreman

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TRAVIS JAMAL FOREMAN…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

Date published: Jan 21, 2021

Citations

957 N.W.2d 38 (Iowa Ct. App. 2021)

Citing Cases

Watson v. United States

In addition, and as pointed out by Detective Gargac, the video captured Mr. Watson shooting at Mr.…