From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Follingstad

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Dec 28, 2016
NO. 35,448 (N.M. Ct. App. Dec. 28, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 35,448

12-28-2016

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DEBORAH FOLLINGSTAD, Defendant-Appellant.

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Deborah Follingstad San Francisco, CA Pro Se Appellant


This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY
Brett R. Loveless, District Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General
Santa Fe, NM for Appellee Deborah Follingstad
San Francisco, CA Pro Se Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WECHSLER, Judge. {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. {2} Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in our calendar notice.

{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ _________

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

WE CONCUR:

/s/ _________
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge /s/ _________
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge


Summaries of

State v. Follingstad

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Dec 28, 2016
NO. 35,448 (N.M. Ct. App. Dec. 28, 2016)
Case details for

State v. Follingstad

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DEBORAH FOLLINGSTAD…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Dec 28, 2016

Citations

NO. 35,448 (N.M. Ct. App. Dec. 28, 2016)