State v. Flowers

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Carmichael Trevon Flowers, Appellant.

Court: THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 25, 2011

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-404 (S.C. Ct. App. Aug. 25, 2011)

Opinion

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-404

08-25-2011

The State, Respondent, v. Carmichael Trevon Flowers, Appellant.

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar L. Clements, III, of Florence, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Florence County

Ralph King Anderson, Jr., Special Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar L. Clements, III, of Florence, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : Carmichael Trevon Flowers appeals his convictions for malicious injury to real property, malicious injury to personal property, and criminal domestic violence, arguing the trial court erred in allowing his trial counsel to continue to represent him after he indicated a desire to waive his right to counsel and proceed pro se. Additionally, Flowers asserts numerous pro se arguments. After a thorough review of the record and all briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.