State v. Flowers

1 Citing case

  1. State v. Flowers

    734 N.W.2d 239 (Minn. 2007)   Cited 274 times
    Holding that a jury instruction was erroneous because it stated that knowing possession “may be inferred if the firearm was in a place under [the accused's] exclusive control” but did not “instruct the jury that it was not required to accept that the inference [of knowledge] necessarily followed from the facts”

    The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed. State v. Flowers, No. A05-213, 2006 WL 1228997 (Minn.App. May 9, 2006). We reverse.