From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Flores

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 19, 2008
197 P.3d 58 (Or. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

Nos. 05C50884; A130805.

Submitted October 3, 2008.

November 19, 2008.

Appeal from the Marion County Circuit Court, Terry Ann Leggert, Judge.

Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Legal Services Division, and Susan F. Drake, Senior Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Michael R. Washington, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Sercombe, Judge.


PER CURIAM

Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.


Defendant pleaded guilty to delivery of a controlled substance to a minor, and the trial court ordered defendant to pay $1,157.73 in restitution for a sexual abuse examination of the victim. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred by imposing restitution for the examination. Defendant argues that the sexual abuse examination did not arise from criminal activity that he admitted committing or for which he was convicted, and the state concedes that the trial court erred in that regard. See State v. Seggerman, 167 Or App 140, 145, 3 P3d 168 (2000) ("[A] defendant cannot be required to pay restitution for pecuniary damages arising out of criminal activity for which he was not convicted or which he did not admit having committed."). We agree and accept the state's concession.

Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Flores

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 19, 2008
197 P.3d 58 (Or. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

State v. Flores

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CARLOS FLORES…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 19, 2008

Citations

197 P.3d 58 (Or. Ct. App. 2008)
197 P.3d 58