From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Flah

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Apr 4, 2013
828 N.W.2d 546 (N.D. 2013)

Opinion

No. 20120357.

2013-04-4

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Kawo FLAH, Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge. Dawn Marie Deitz, Assistant State's Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, ND, for defendant and appellant.


Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.
Dawn Marie Deitz, Assistant State's Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, ND, for defendant and appellant.
PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] Kawo Flah appeals a district court judgment of conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia after a jury trial. Flah argues the prosecutor improperly vouched for the truth and veracity of the testimony of two police officers. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). State v. Clark, 2004 ND 85, ¶ 9, 678 N.W.2d 765 (a prosecutor's closing argument may properly draw reasonable conclusions and argue permissible inferences from the evidence). [¶ 2]

GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., DANIEL J. CROTHERS, MARY MUEHLEN MARING, CAROL RONNING KAPSNER and DALE V. SANDSTROM, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Flah

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Apr 4, 2013
828 N.W.2d 546 (N.D. 2013)
Case details for

State v. Flah

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Kawo FLAH, Defendant and…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Date published: Apr 4, 2013

Citations

828 N.W.2d 546 (N.D. 2013)
2013 N.D. 22